Saturday, October 25, 2008

Insights for a Pro-Azadi Kashmiri...

(Response to a recent comment on my post: Time for Introspection.... , relevant for many pro-azadi kashmiris..)
Dear Anonymous,
It is very easy to post a comment without thinking about the implications.
Why do you think that when 100Crore people in India have a say in their future, much better than rest of the developing countries, (even incomparable to Pakistan!!), a mere 70 lakh people would have a problem? (70 Lakh include population from Rajauri, Poonch, Doda, Kupwara, Baramulla, Srinagar, Badgam, Pulwama and Anantnag as per old district setup, 2001 census)
The problem is that we Kashmiris never think.
Suppose you get the "Azaadi" that you demand. Would you then be able to decide your "future"?Who will decide it?
Your Hurriyat Leaders, who keep on changing their allegience every now and then? And have hoarded their houses with money flowing in from different agencies? And live under Indian security shouting slogans of Azadi? And spend Indian taxpayers money for innumerable five-star treatments?
Or the two Lone brothers, who find it difficult to accept even each other?
Or the innumerable tanzeems and Ikhwanis who were active a few years back? (Who will certainly be revived in case you get your "Azadi")? Who killed people for ransom, and for settling personal scores?
Or the Muftis? about who I need not comment.
And how do you define "say in future". There cant be an idealistic state. To be practical, we have to compare the "say in future" we have, to existing countries around us. And let me tell with pride that India is amongst the top ones in the list.
Now coming to sustainability, that you "feel" is not an issue.
What is our population today? 70 Lacs....
Out of these, how many do you think would be young people? say 30% which makes it 21 Lacs.Out of these how many do you think will join your army? Even if the number is 1% (The % for India, which has one of the largest Army in the world, is 0.25%) that makes it just around 21,000 (After considering a 4-times turn out of 1% from 0.25%)
Today, our forces, excluding Police, are estimated at 7,00,000 who protect our borders against Pakistan & China directly and against innumerable countries indirectly.How do you think you are going to address to this issue with just 21,000 people (By exaggerated estimates)?
Today you talk about "say in future" because you are in India. God forbid, if you have what you desire, you would no longer talk about these issues. And I need not say what the new issues would be.
Official estimates claim that more than 7,00,000 people have been killed in Afghanistan. They dont have proper systems for health, education, sanitation, governance and the people cannot have a "say in their future" Do we want this for us?
If educated people (Educated because so far we are not Afghanistan) like us start neglegting the issues of sustainence and stability, we have no locus-standi to pass judgements about the future of 70 Lac people, whose future depends upon opinion of each one of us.
This is just about military stability. I can go on and on and give insights about political, social, economic security and stability. But I want you, and people like you to ponder over what we realy want for ourselves...

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Time for Introspection.....

In the earlier posts, this blog has tried potray one side of the coin. This one tries to address the other side...
We as Kashmiris also need some introspection into what went wrong with the paradise that was.
Response to one of Kashmir Blogs that advocate an independent Kashmir...
"It is not only about economic viability, we need political and military stability as well. Sheikh Abdullah's speech to the Constituent Assemby gives pros and cons about the options that we have...And why we acceeded to India by choice and not by compulsion.

There have been issues. But just think, will Azaadi really give us what we want?
Do we have a leadership that can drive us, or resources that can protect us against Pakistan, China, Afghanistan?
And against Taliban ?
Do we want to create another Afghanistan?
Is this what we dream of?
Why do we raise Pakistani flags every now and then?
It was Pakistan that attacked us and snatched away a part of our valley.
Pakistan could never establish even a single system after separation and is today fighting for survival.

An improved system under the existing setup is what we need for Kashmir.
Our so-called leaders have always misled and used us.
We did not participate in the Census of 2001 and allowed flawed numbers to flow into the report. Had we participated, it could have made a vast difference in the electoral setup of the valley.
Why do we not participate in the elections? Some of our bigest leaders today, who issue farmaans for boycotting elections have been a part of the electoral process in the past; when it suited them. Since they get a better deal today by singing the songs of separatism, they want all of us to refrain from voting.
I agree that in the past, many of the elections were manupulated. But things are different now. The whole world is watching. Last election was quite transparent by Indian standards.
Every one of us must participate in this election and bring to power an accountable government.
Indian leaders have mishandled Kashmir to an extent for so many years and that has led to alienation of Kashmiris. But, we also have not been less responsible for our condition today.
Do you remember what we Kashmiris did during the militancy?
Innumerable "Tanzeems" demanding ransom..Killing innocent people..branding them as Mukhbirs...Muslims, Kashmiri Pundits..sikhs.. alike..
Who are renegades or Ikhwanis? They are all Kashmiris..
It is high time we introspect what these twenty years of bloodshed have brought to a common Kashmiri.
Do we have a better option than to stay in harmony with India, albeit, demand an equitable treatment? Treatment that every Indian gets in free India.
Should we look at isolated incidents, and keep blaming India for every wrong? Or should we think positively and make a difference to our lives to lives of our fellow citizens?
There are extremists from the RSS who want us thrown out. But there are also a large number of Hindu intellectuals who come and defend our cause. That is the greatness of our country, India.
I firmly believe that it is only because of India that you and me enjoy this freedom. Had India not come to our rescue during the Kabali raid, you and I would have probably been in some Afghan town defending ourselves with klashinkoves. Or who knows, would not have been there at all?
It is high time that we understand the designs of separatists for whose vested interests more than 1,00,000 Kashmiris have already laid down their lives.
A new thought process must be started by us; Young Kashmiris who can strive to bring back peace again to the lost paradise..."

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Time for Introspection...

Recently, I read an article (Will the Jhelum Smile Again?) written by Col (Retd) Anil Athale on rediff. Although he has written nothing relevant or even worthwile in the article (For example he says the Indian Govt. sells rice at Rs. 3 a KG to Kashmiris!!!), it became a discussion board for me to explain to my fellow brothers the actual state of affairs in Kashmir.

I was more shocked than surprised to see everyone attacking me in a synchronized manner. And the sad part is, not even a single person talked anything relevant about the Kashmir issue.
Most of the readers appeared to be inspired by Sangh-Parivar-like-stories with base neither in reality nor in history.
People talked about "Islamic Terrorism", a term coined by God knows who (Since Islam preaches peace, equality and justice more than anybody else), about Pakistan, about all Muslims being terrorists and even about a new strategy of minorities in India whereby an author, Ashish commented that minorities were playing victims in India and were planning to divide-and-rule India. I quote, "Currently the strategy is simple. Single out the strongest part of the body from it, which can fight or protect the body. And then work on and target the weaker parts and eat them all away eventually."

God knows where such ideas come from! However, he was not the only one. Many others rhymed with him.
People even talked about Muslims taking a weekly snan (The only one in a week!!) on a Friday. Having heard such things for the first time, I didnt have ready answers to many of these questions, Since being a Muslim, I know that Islam teaches us to keep highest level of personal hygiene.

The point I'm trying to make here is that Islam has been grossly misunderstood by our fellow brothers and sisters. I dont however blame ignorant people asking irrelevant questions. Blame for such an image of Islam today equally rests with us as well.

We as Muslims have not only failed to create a correct perception about ourselves, but have also allowed the perception to become synonymous with terrorism and backwardness.

While I was trying my best to restrict the discussion to Kashmir, all others kept on raising questions about Islam, terrorism and Pakistan. Some even went to the extent of quoting what Islamic Terrorists had been doing across the globe.

Another friend even went ahead to suggest a partition of population. Unfortunately, we have a short-term memory and nobody in our generation remebers that more than 1 Million people, Hindus and Muslims, were brutally killed in the worst ever partition of our country, not very long back. People seem to have no compassion left for each other.

Since rediff has auto comment moderation, a fellow brother even went ahead and coined a slogan for us (Muslims), (albiet written backwards!) "ak hsed hey aran ah "MILSUM ORAM HSED OOAHCAB"

I wonder why our brothers and sisters, on the other side of the Pir Panjal cannot see Kashmir issue independent of these inconsequential doctored fables. I wonder why nobody wants to address the people of Kashmir instead of land of Kashmir. I wonder why nobody realises the value of human lives. I wonder why there is no compassion left in the world. I wonder.....
What went wrong...
We have been treated as property and not as individuals. In the 19th century, Gulab Singh purchased us for a discounted price of Rs. 75 lakhs (Since the original demanded amount was Rs 1.5 Crore), at less than Rs. 2 per person!!

Today is no different. India and our brothers and sisters in India do not realise that they are dealing with people, not with property. I am an Indian and would want each Indian to introspect and try to listen to our grief, pain and sorrow, that has worsened over the years due to alienating policies of the government and indifferent attitute of the people.

Unfortunately, the face of India in Kashmir is the Army (Including Paramilitary Forces). The uncontrolled and unlimited power given to such entities has resulted in more than 1,00,000 killings over the years. (Both by terrorists as well as security forces)

How does a common Kashmiri see India under such circumstances?

Now a possible solution to our problems that comes to my mind is that India should adopt a compassionate policy towards us, and much more than that, our brothers and sisters in India must start respecting us. Every individual deserves respect and so do we.
Many Kashmiris have lost faith in the Indian system and the reasons are not very difficult to find.
How do you expect someone to trust you when more often than not people start doubting your allegience?
When you are looked upon as a synonym of terrorism?
An outcast?
A Pakistani?
By your own brothers and sisters?
In your own homeland?
I wish someone had answers for these questions.
We need a major shift in the attitute of government and people towards us.
The world has been hearing echoes of Kashmir being an integral part of India.
Has somebody ever heard anyone claiming "Kashmiris" to be integral part of India?
I bet no one ever has.
Time for some introspection brothers!

Thursday, October 16, 2008

George Bush on Islam...

"Islam is Peace" Says President Remarks by the President at Islamic Center of Washington, D.C.Washington, D.C.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all very much for your hospitality. We've just had a -- wide-ranging discussions on the matter at hand. Like the good folks standing with me, the American people were appalled and outraged at last Tuesday's attacks. And so were Muslims all across the world. Both Americans and Muslim friends and citizens, tax-paying citizens, and Muslims in nations were just appalled and could not believe what we saw on our TV screens.
These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith. And it's important for my fellow Americans to understand that.
The English translation is not as eloquent as the original Arabic, but let me quote from the Koran, itself: In the long run, evil in the extreme will be the end of those who do evil. For that they rejected the signs of Allah and held them up to ridicule.
The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don't represent peace. They represent evil and war.
When we think of Islam we think of a faith that brings comfort to a billion people around the world. Billions of people find comfort and solace and peace. And that's made brothers and sisters out of every race -- out of every race.
America counts millions of Muslims amongst our citizens, and Muslims make an incredibly valuable contribution to our country. Muslims are doctors, lawyers, law professors, members of the military, entrepreneurs, shopkeepers, moms and dads. And they need to be treated with respect. In our anger and emotion, our fellow Americans must treat each other with respect.
Women who cover their heads in this country must feel comfortable going outside their homes. Moms who wear cover must be not intimidated in America. That's not the America I know. That's not the America I value.
I've been told that some fear to leave; some don't want to go shopping for their families; some don't want to go about their ordinary daily routines because, by wearing cover, they're afraid they'll be intimidated. That should not and that will not stand in America.
Those who feel like they can intimidate our fellow citizens to take out their anger don't represent the best of America, they represent the worst of humankind, and they should be ashamed of that kind of behavior.
This is a great country. It's a great country because we share the same values of respect and dignity and human worth. And it is my honor to be meeting with leaders who feel just the same way I do. They're outraged, they're sad. They love America just as much as I do.
I want to thank you all for giving me a chance to come by. And may God bless us all.
Remarks by the President at Islamic Center of Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C.
September 17, 2001

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Alien Natives...

However, there is one thing. I saw that two of the authors in the previous comment have suggested that, what they like to call, the aboriginals of Kashmir are the Kashmiri Pundits and the Kashmiri Muslims, “ the non-state subjects”, “all of them”, are the invaders or settlers who came from outside. Certainly, due to the forgetful nature of time, there exists no empirical evidence, which these authors can produce, to support this surmise. But we can, however, try to theorize taking into account certain known facts and experiences of other cultures. As far as “mythology” goes, I remember reading somewhere that it was Kashyp Rishi (the word Kashmir apparently derived from his name) a scholar from India who traveled north in search of greater truth or some such thing and finally reached the valley. After killing all the “demons” (Jalad Bhava, the leader of demons translates into “Water-Demon”), who might as well have been the local populace, decided to settle there along with his followers. This might give us a picture of who might be the “aboriginals” and who the foreigners in the Kashmir. It usually happens that whenever invaders come and settle in a place, the local population does all it can to distance itself from such invaders. This might explain the overnight conversion of the entire Kashmiri population to Islam. It is always the higher class, the ruling class that rejects change and tries to maintain status quo and in turn retain the power they have over the lower strata of the society. Maybe this is the reason why the decedents of Kashyp Rishi didn’t convert to Islam and preferred to carry on with the religion passed on to them by their forefathers. Kashmiri Pundits have always been the more influential, more educated class in Kashmir, a fact that they should be proud of. But one has to wonder why this distinction cuts across two criterions. Why one set of people were, both more powerful and at the same time of a particular faith? The only “logical” (we are famous for that, aren’t we?) conclusion can be drawn is that it is Kashmiri Pundits who are the decedents of foreign settlers and maybe that’s the reason why they find it so easy to dismiss every, political, historical and cultural, peculiarity of Kashmir and identify themselves with the Indian Dominion.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Some beautiful comments that we kashmiris receive every now and then...

Free Jammu: "whats with this blogger from the valley?he really seems to overwhelmed by having witnessed snowfall,having worn a firan,or having eaten waazwan and all that balderdash.Well there are a few other things also that he should identify his goodself and his valley with,may be he should also seek pride in the ethnic cleansing and the jihad ,the terrorism that kashmir is so synonymous with, may be he should also understand that if at all there are any aboriginals of and from the valley, it is only the kashmiri pandits rest are all invaders,who came and settled there!and as far as wearing a firan goes,who the hell wants to wear that smelly old rug,which reminds of nothing but anachronism. "

Jammu United: "What’s with this blogger from the valley,he really seems to be a connoisseur (though a self proclaimed one,like most of these kashmiris!)all so full of logic and data,well i hope that somewhere in there he also has a small(if at all!) mention of the rather abysmal exit of the kashmiri hindus, the aboriginal kashmiris(rest are all non state subjects!!), hope he also has a data regarding the temples that have been desecrated in the valley, hope he is also aware of the fact that it was his kashmiri brethen who opposed installation of mahatama gandhi’s(symbol of tolerance and peace across the globe) statue in the kashmir high court, but all so gladly accept gandhi in their pockets!!hope somewhere in his data he also has this mention of the plight of his kashmiri brethen in the pak occupied kashmir,and not to talk of mohajirs,the balochs etc. who are so proud to be a part pakistan that all so magnanimous,purely islamic country!"
Blogger-Jammu: "dear blogger kashmir
Since you people are so intelligent to our facts..please let us know your utlimate aims?Why are you so busy correcting/cleasing/misinterpretating general knowlwdge.In all aspects you have 3 options:

1. Stay with us, i.e. INDIA.we`ve all ways treated you like our misbehaved/rotten brothers. We`ll continue to feed you with essential commodities, food supplies, money, central packages, developmemtal work etc. ( All for our motherland HINDUSTAN)

2. Fight with us, leave us and goto the Mighty Pakisthan - the country with ISLAMIC rules. We would be more than happy to see our rotten brother happy. But come to think of it, how and where would you sell those apples, those shawls, those carvings, or nights at dal lake? whom? i bet pakishan with its poor poor people would be more than willing to pay.Fact: pak population 144 million.Poverty rate 35%Ref: CIA Factbook.I`m sure how big a buying power Pakistan is. BIG BIG Industrialised economy of pak.

3. BE independent of INDIA & Pakistan. - This one is a real joke.
If you are independent of us, then:you get no subsidised essentials, no telecom, no tax breaks, no cheap food, no cheap labour, no access to our vast capital base, no army protection, amogst others.China, a dictatorship, is more than willing to attck u, to show its superamacy in the region. Pak, with nothin to show off really, would still try n attack, to salvage pride.kashmir would be the worlds biggest terrorist school, a haven for al quidas and SIMIs..America would be more than willing to attck and invade you. The best base america can get, seeing the approxmity with CHINDIA.
So, while u decide, i`ll have to get back to work, as you are my liability rite now, if i dont earn, how you get subsidised food, great rail, air, road connect, huge central packages, subsidies for haj ..etc…etc.."


Anonymous: "Kashmirs are the most intelligent people in the world. Fact: more than 12000 deaths since 1947"

Monday, October 13, 2008

Sunday, October 12, 2008

My heart bleeds for India. Yours doesn’t. Yours bleeds only for the BJP - Karan Thapar

Reproduction of interview of Arun Jaitley by Karan Thapar on The Devil's Advocate.
Mr. Jaitley claimed that there was no economic blockade..
A few independent proofs to show the real picture before we go ahead with the interview

1. "The blockade of the Srinagar-Jammu National Highway by the Amarnath Sangharsh Samiti — led by BJP and affiliates — has virtually stopped movement of essential supplies from Jammu to Kashmir. The immediate impact of the blockade has been felt in the state’s famed fruit industry. Hundreds of tonnes of fruits are reportedly rotting on the roads." -
- Business World

2. "Kashmir valley short of essentials after highway blockade" - Indian Express ; Reuters

3. "Impact of Kashmir's economic blockade to continue longer"- Economic Times

Is the BJP guilty of stoking the separatism in Jammu and Kashmir by its chase of an electoral agenda? Has the BJP’s wrong timing helped fan separatist beliefs in the valley? Did the BJP not initiate the economic blockade of the valley and if yes, why? These were some of the questions Karan Thapar put to BJP General Secretary Arun Jaitley on Devil’s Advocate.

Karan Thapar: Let us start with the BJP’s role in Jammu. How do you justify the fact that the party that preaches nationalism is deliberately pursuing a policy that is inflaming separatism in the Kashmir valley?
Arun Jaitley: I think you are being too naïve when you ask this question. Do you seriously think that the separatists in the Valley have re-launched the separatist movement because of the land issue?
Karan Thapar: Absolutely!
Arun Jaitley: Absolutely not!
Karan Thapar: They’ve been given the opportunity because of the land issue.
Arun Jaitley:Absolutely not and let’s not be naïve. We have been naïve for the last sixty years…those who subscribed to that thought and I won’t be naïve. Let me answer it. First, the separatists lied to the whole country and to the whole world, saying that Hindu colonisation would come up in the Valley. There was no body in the Valley, not even the state government or the Central government that countered that propaganda.
The separatists lied to the whole world saying that there was an economic blockade. Nobody was willing to counter that. We are ones who are countering it. And today we are the ones who are saying that the land transfer is pursuant to a law enacted by the state legislature, pursuant to a direction of the high court. Why should it not be implemented?
Karan Thapar: Alright, I let you speak and let you have your say in full without interrupting. Now let me reply. First of all, it wasn’t the separatists alone who reacted to the land transfer. The PDP and the National Conference, who are not separatists, were just as there.
Arun Jaitley:That’s the tragedy.
Karan Thapar: Well, that’s a fact.
Arun Jaitley:That’s a tragic fact.
Karan Thapar: But it’s a fact, all the same. The second point is that there was a blockade. Figures released by the Jammu and Kashmir horticultural department, which is a part of the official government, prove that between the first of August and the 17th of August this year, only 890 trucks bearing fruit came from Srinagar to the Banihal pass where as last year during the same dates, the figure was 2,148—a fall of nearly sixty per cent.
Arun Jaitley:Let’s be very clear. If there is a bandh and a curfew in Jammu for 50 days, if you have a curfew in the Valley for 30 days plus, business is bound to go down. Please, I have gone to the Valley myself. We asked the Army and the district administration as to what is the position. They gave us the daily figures. This was not the apple season.
They said, we have nothing lying in the stocks and today we have 90 trucks waiting at the sabzi mandis, and there is nothing to be loaded on it. It was a false propaganda. Any fall in traffic could be because of the bandh and the curfew. The fall in traffic was not because of any economic blockade.
Karan Thapar: The fall in the traffic was because your ministers of the Punjab government, Manoranjan Kalia and Mohanlal, were actively creating a blockade at Madhopur. Both of them camped at Pathankot. More importantly, they personally obstructed trucks from Jammu and Kashmir. You cannot deny that.
Arun Jaitley: That is totally incorrect.
Karan Thapar: They haven’t denied that, how can you?
Arun Jaitley:I am denying it for the reason—that there were protests in Jammu and in Punjab which led to the disruption of traffic. The BJP and the Akali Dal leadership in Punjab personally intervened and said: protest on any road but not on the highway because the highway would lead to a stoppage of traffic. Any stoppage on a road because of a protest is not a blockade.
Karan Thapar: You are wrong. Your own MLA Dinesh Kumar Babu said this, he boasted about it. He said, ‘I led the agitation and we will not allow Jammu and Kashmir trucks to ply in Punjab.’
Arun Jaitley:One day there was a problem due to a demonstration. They were told to keep their demonstrations outside the national highway.
Karan Thapar: The fact of the matter is that the drug controller had to appeal for the air-lifting of the drugs, he did it officially. The Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir wrote to the all India pharmaceutical manufacturers’ association to arrange supplies from other cities.
Arun Jaitley:Again half truth.
Karan Thapar: The complete truth!
Arun Jaitley:Half truth, because, the Drug Controller and the Divisional Commissioner, when they appeared before the All-party committee, said that the distributors of these medicines were in Jammu. Because there was a bandh and a curfew and a bandh in Jammu, they could not get it; therefore the manufacturers must directly supply it to the valley. Now it was not because of any blockade.
Karan Thapar: No. I am afraid that’s the half-truth.
Arun Jaitley:Well, I heard the Divisional Commissioner myself, you didn’t hear him. The Divisional Commissioner told the all-party delegation that this was obstructed due to the bandh and the curfew in Jammu so we asked the manufacturer and we have never had a short supply.
Karan Thapar: The reason why this is a half truth is you haven’t answered why was there an obstruction taking place and the reason is this. Drivers were scared to cross. At Rambhan, traffic stopped, which is why there is a blockade, which is why people’s livelihood is suffering.
Arun Jaitley:This is again a partial and tainted presentation of facts. Fact is that drivers on both sides were afraid to cross and therefore needed security and we were told security is being provided.
Karan Thapar: And that is why the Valley felt cut-off and that is why later on the separatism was inflamed.
Arun Jaitley:The Valley was never cut off. There was not a single packet of fruit lying there for the want of transportation out. The Divisional Commissioner said they had abundant supplies of medicines brought directly to the valley.
Karan Thapar: Excuse me but Mobin Shah, the president of the Kashmir Chamber of Commerce, has said that if the fruit industry in Kashmir is worth Rupees 2,500 crores, it has suffered loss of a thousand crore. Well, that is almost 40 per cent.
Arun Jaitley:Well, Mobin Shah is a part of the Hurriyat. He refused to meet the all-party delegation. He was leading those trucks going to Muzaffarabad. He was preventing the trucks from loading up at the vegetable market, which the divisional commissioner had put up. Ninety trucks had been put up. He was preventing that from being done. Lets not take his statement as the gospel truth.
Karan Thapar: Alright , lets then go away from the ‘tu-tu-main-main’ (arguments and bickering) and let us look at other facts. You know that Kashmir is a different state from any other state in India. It is disputed territory between Indian and Pakistan. It is an unresolved matter if you take the Lahore declaration, which your government signed.
In those circumstances, to persist with the blockade when it had led to calls for the opening of the Muzaffarabad border was like pouring oil on fire. You did that. You inflamed sentiments that were latent. You created a secessionist movement.
Arun Jaitley:Do not give weight to the falsehood spread by the separatists that there was any economic blockade. The Army’s position is that there is no blockade; the government’s position is that there is no blockade and the Sanghash Samiti told us that there never was a blockade and there won’t be a blockade.
Karan Thapar: So how come shopkeepers are complaining of shortages of medicines and vegetable?
Arun Jaitley:We were told personally by the Divisional Commissioner that there was no shortage of medicines as far as the hospitals were concerned. The Governor maintained that. Let’s not go by the Hurriyat propaganda.
Karan Thapar: I am not going by the Hurriyat propaganda. I am going by what ‘The Indian Express’, ‘The Times of India’ and ‘Hindustan Times’.
Arun Jaitley:I am going by what the district administration, the hospital, the Army and administration have told us. Let me tell you one more thing. I do not accept this proposition of Kashmir being a disputed territory. It may be Pakistan’s unfinished agenda after partition and our Independence.
Karan Thapar: The Lahore declaration signed by your government says that it is an outstanding issue. So clearly, it means that it is unresolved. Your own government said so.
Arun Jaitley:The only outstanding issue, and I reiterate it, is Pakistan must accept that Kashmir is an integral part of India and India will not under any circumstances barter away or part with an inch of its territories.
Karan Thapar: That may be your interpretation but the fact of the matter is that the world recognises Kashmir as a disputed situation. The government on many occasions has said that it requires a final settlement.
Arun Jaitley: I am afraid that due to the erroneous policies of the government of India in the late forties and early fifties, there was some inter-nationalisation of the issue. The last few years, the world is not willing to internationalise the issue.
Karan Thapar: But your government has accepted it.
Arun Jaitley: Especially after 9/11, the world is not going to listen to separatist organisations like this which have used violence as an instrument of separatism.
Karan Thapar: Let me come to the core issue that you do not want to focus upon and it is this. For the last ten years increasingly, the separatist movement was dying down. This year there was a record turnout of tourists. And yet, what has the BJP implemented economic blockade in Jammu done? It has inflamed separatist tendencies to the point at which the separatists today are thanking you. Syed Ali Shah Geelani, the most hard-lined Islamist, has publicly said, “I thank the BJP for reviving a movement which was lagging.”
Arun Jaitley:I do not think that we need that compliment or thanks from him. Let me make it clear. We are only supporting the demand of the Amarnath Sanghash Samiti in Jammu and the demand precisely is this. You have lakhs of tourists going, the shrine board has a duty under law to maintain pilgrim facilities
The shrine board has legitimately been transferred some land which is to be used during the yatra. And if the Government of India starts to come under pressure from the separatists then it will not have legitimacy.
Karan Thapar: Its not the fact that you supported the Amarnath demand that I question, it’s the manner in which you did it and the consequences of your support. You have cut off the Valley; you have generated a feeling amongst the people of Kashmir that they do not belong.
As a result you have inspired in them a desire for azadi and secession. Movements were latent have now revived, Suddenly, you have the whole valley, in voice shouting ‘jeeye jeeye Pakistan, Bharat teri maut ayee! (Long live Pakistan; India, you are dead.). And your blockade is solely responsible for it.
Arun Jaitley:Well I reject this suggestion that you are making in total. Your saying and suggesting that there is a blockade only aids the false propaganda that is spread by the separatists. It is not I alone who reject this. This is supported by what the journalists flown by the Army helicopters have to say.
Karan Thapar: What about those journalists who live there?
Arun Jaitley:Cameras do not lie, people do. And therefore I have seen it on camera that there was no blockade
Karan Thapar: Cameras have shown hundreds of thousands of Kahmiris waving Pakitani flags, demanding azadi; administration has collapsed. You are the cause.
Arun Jaitley:Cameras have also shown four lakh people holding the national flag and courting arrest in Jammu, peacefully saying that give us this land for pilgrim facility.
Karan Thapar: But could you have not demanded it without a blockade?
Arun Jaitley:There was no blockade. The blockade is a lie perpetuated by the ISI (Pakistan’s intelligence agency) and supported by Hurriyat. And that is why I will request every Indian journalist not to believe the lies spread by these organisation. I would request every Indian journalist to give no credibility to such lies.
Karan Thapar: Except the fact that it is believed by everyone in the Valley that and let me quote something.
Arun Jaitley:It is rebutted by the Army, the district administration and by the state government, the government of India. You have all these words against your word.
Karan Thapar: Except the fact that the information secretary of the Lashkar-e-Taiyyaba (LeT) is also among those who are thanking your party. Let me quote to you what he said.
Arun Jaitley: Hurriyat and LeT’s word may carry weight with you. They do not carry weight with me.
Karan Thapar: Unfortunately, they carry weight with the people of the valley.
Arun Jaitley:That is the tragedy. It should not carry weight with the people of the valley, that’s what we are to jointly decide.
Karan Thapar: You are creating a situation where it increasingly does. You are not undermining the influence, you are adding to it.
Arun Jaitley:We are only creating a situation where people in the Valley should not raise a demand that is separatist in character and the government of India should not cow down to a demand that is separatist in nature.
Karan Thapar: But look at the way that you have inflamed separatist sentiments. This is what the information secretary of the LeT has been saying. He says, ‘The BJP suits us. LeT is getting a good response due to the BJP’s sentiments.’ Then he says, ‘We pray to God they come to power again. Then we will emerge even stronger.’ What Pakistan failed to do in sixty years, you have done it in six weeks.
Arun Jaitley:We have been in power at the centre for six years. We initiated the peace process, and moved Kashmir in the direction of peace.
Karan Thapar: And now you are moving it all the way towards Pakistan.
Arun Jaitley:I am sorry, we are not doing that. All we are saying is that if separatists raise a demand; do not allow the aspirations of the nationalists to be cowed down.
Karan Thapar: Without thinking and just because you have the best interests of your party in mind, you are once again pushing Jammu into a divide with the Valley.
Even more unthinkable is the fact that in these very circumstances now your former party president Venkaiah Naidu is now claiming that Jammu is under-represented and unfairly treated by the political system. He said that Jammu has not adequate representation in the state assembly. Is this the right time at which to raise such political, sensitive issues?
Arun Jaitley:Well, first lets know the facts. Today, you have in Jammu, more number of voters, numerically and yet they are under represented in the assembly. They have lesser jobs as far as state government is concerned. They have lesser admissions as far as colleges are concerned. Now the entire movement in Jammu may be because of the land-issue but there is a huge sense of discrimination that the people have. The government should have addressed this sense of discrimination at some stage
Karan Thapar: Once again I allowed you to present the facts as you see them but I am sorry that you got them all wrong. The truth is that if you go by the registered voters, no doubt Jammu has more registered voters but you and I know that due to militancy in the valley, there is a huge under-registration there. So instead, go by the total population. That’s how constituencies are divided.
Arun Jaitley:I find that ridiculous.
Karan Thapar: If you go by the total population, you discover that there are 46 MLAs in Kashmir and 37 in Jammu, but for every MLA, there is a total of 1,19,000 people in both regions. This means that the division has been done perfectly in accordance with the rules. It is not unfair, it is totally justified.
Arun Jaitley:Now that you have made your point, this appeared a story in Hindu. That is where you got your data. And now you must know the true facts. 1951, there was no census in Jammu and Kashmir. 1961, Kashmir had three lakh people more than Jammu, 1971 also it had three lakh people more. 1981, again it had four lakh people more. 1991, there was no census. So it was four lakhs more in 1981. But between 1981 and 2001 you had the Kashmiri pundits being pushed out, the Sikhs pushed out and even the wealthier Muslims pushed out because they found it unsafe.
So the population of Jammu would have increased. Instead, the 2001 census, a rigged census, I reiterate, showed eleven lakhs more in the valley. Should have been less. So the election commission said we will go door to door and conduct a registration of voters. In militancy, you can register people in terms of population, you can also register voters and suddenly you find that Jammu has more voters. Today, you find an incongruous situation where Valley has more registered people through that census of 2001 but effectively two and a half lakh less voters.

Karan Thapar: It is very interesting that today you are raising concerns about the 2001 census, which you call rigged. You happened to be the government in power at the time. Why did you not raise any concerns when it was declared? Why did you not raise these doubts earlier? Why are you conveniently raising them today?
Arun Jaitley:When the facts belie your contentions and claim, now you ask me why I did not raise these concerns before.
Karan Thapar: The fact is your interpretation. Its your interpretation, not figures.
Arun Jaitley:I am giving you figures from 1961 to 2002.
Karan Thapar: Population can change in twenty years.
Arun Jaitley:Population of Doda, Kishtwar and Bhadrawa, which were Muslim majority districts of Jammu did not change but population of valley changes.
Karan Thapar: If population of New York can change because of twelve hours of power failure, and you know that it has happened, surely the population can change.
Arun Jaitley:If you have been reading the papers, people have migrated from the Valley, not into the Valley. So population should have gone down and not gone up by eleven lakhs.
Karan Thapar: But why raise the concerns now, why not in your time when it was held? Arun Jaitley:I am sorry. This issue has been raised at every stage. People of Jammu have been raising it. I was a part of the working group under the Prime Minister’s roundtable. I have raised it in writing, there.
Karan Thapar: Leave the facts aside because there is going to be a difference of interpretations.
Arun Jaitley:No interpretations. It is statistics.
Karan Thapar: You know what Churchill said of statistics…they come after lies and damned lies.
Arun Jaitley:Well the voters in Jammu are two and a half lakh more, how come the Valley has more people?
Karan Thapar: But why at such a sensitive time when the Valley is inflamed and the divide between Jammu and Kashmir is huge. Why raise it now?
Arun Jaitley:Well, it looks like your heart bleeds not for Jammu and only for the Valley.
Karan Thapar: My heart bleeds for India. Yours doesn’t. Yours bleeds only for the BJP.
Arun Jaitley:
Your vision and policies have been responsible for what has happened in Kashmir. As far as Jammu is concerned, it is crying due to discrimination and this is a strong ground of discrimination and you want to shut a popular debate out on this discrimination? Karan Thapar: It is not a popular debate. It is that BJP deliberately exploiting a political situation to gain electoral benefits.
Arun Jaitley:I am afraid that it hurts people if statistics suit Jammu
Karan Thapar: You are so blinded by the belief that by jumping onto the Jammu bandwagon, you improve your electoral prospects for the next elections. You do not care what happens to the country. I am accusing you of putting the BJP before the country.
Arun Jaitley:I am putting the country before and that is why I am deeply concerned about 60 years of policy—the separate policy on Kashmir—has led to a movement of separatism. I think history will make a cruel judgment one day whether Nehruvian vision on Kashmir was right or was Dr (Shyama Prasad) Mukherjee’s vision on Kashmir right? I am sure both of us will await that judgment
Karan Thapar: I am glad you brought up the history today. Many people think that India could be on the brink of losing the Valley forever. If that were to happen, history will judge that the BJP were the first persons that gave Kashmir the first push into the arms of Islamabad.
Arun Jaitley:This will not happen because I am one of those who firmly believe that Azadi is not even a distant dream for those separatists, it is an impossible thing. India will not and should not compromise with even an inch of its territory
Karan Thapar: The tragedy is that it may not be a distant dream but a reality
Arun Jaitley:I am not even getting into the blame game though I firmly believe that the Congress must today correct 60 years of its error into which it has fallen.
Karan Thapar: Alright Mr Jaitley, I’ll let you have the last word on that. A pleasure talking to you on Devil’s Advocate.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Identity and Violence

This blog seems to be centered on the Jammu-Kashmir divide and seems to portray a picture that this is the problem facing the state/region. While the issue (Shri Amarnath land transfer) has invoked strong sentiments on both sides, I see it only as an effect of what has been going on.
Protests in Jammu were a reaction to what happened in Kashmir.
It is thus, I believe, important to understand why Kashmir reacted the way it did.
For a start, there are two basic issues-that of identity and of recognition, that must be considered if one honestly seeks to understand the ‘people of kashmir’, keeping the biases aside.
Identity
I am a Muslim. I am a Kashmiri. Am I an Indian?
I envy the confidence with which Omar Abdullah asserted that he is one and that he did not see a problem with it. I wish I could say that too.
What is my identity? On what equation does a Kashmiri identity stand when juxtaposed with a Muslim and an Indian identity?
The question is not an easy one to answer. I have been looking for answers. I have been trying to discover my identity. Do I look for it in Islam, in the preamble of the constitution of India or just confine myself to Kashmiriyat? Or is it a blend of them? If it is indeed a blend, is there a hierarchy between them? If not, are they totally unconnected and/or mutually exclusive? Most of all, why am I faced with such questions?
I am facing a major crisis. The issue that I hold closest to my heart has been that of Kashmir. It is a tragedy that I do not have an opinion about it. However hard I might have tried.

Is the Kashmir problem a result of this confusion that I am also facing(if it indeed is, what is the reason for this confusion)?Is a majority of Kashmiris(if not just everyone) facing the same problem as I am? The picture that the past few decades have presented about us..undecided, confused, one moment for azadi, the other for Pakistan and yet another for India, is pathetic. Is this nature inherent in our genes? Is that what I am, a hypocrite?
There is one answer I do know. It is not in my genes. It is not in Our genes. We are not hypocrites. We want peace and we want democracy.
It is not the confusion that is the cause of the problem. It is the way Kashmir has been handled that has given rise to this confusion-of identity, which is inextricably linked to the fact of recognition, of recognition of the simple fact that Kashmir belongs to the people of Kashmir also and it is the people of Kashmir who belong there.
Recognition
I was born a Kashmiri. Something I have always been proud of and a fact that I cherish. Like any other individual, right thinking individual, I am terrified when I see what I see in Kashmir and have often thought about why the situation is so.
I do not propose to delve into any philosophical analysis of the problem. I only wish to bring forth one single experience of mine that shattered me as an individual(not just as a ‘Kashmiri Muslim’) and invoked the abovementioned and various other questions, some of which I find myself incapable of articulating .
I had just finished college and had invited my friends home. To Kashmir. Since I was the one who belonged to the place, they trusted me with the task of planning the trip. Morning of day 3 was booked for Shankar Acharya Mandir.
I was the early riser in the group. That day too, I woke up, offered my namaz and woke everyone up. I got into the drivers seat and set out.
I was really proud of being where I was. Each and every word of praise that I heard about Kashmir from my friends elated me so much as if it was me who was being praised. This was not to be.
There is a barricade about 3 kms before the temple. We were stopped, like all other cars. I stopped and greeted the ‘army wala’. Still proud of the fact that I was in my motherland. Her beauty was still captivating despite the years of turmoil.
The ‘army wala’ asked us where we were headed. I answered. He asked me who the ‘local’ were. I, swollen with pride, declared it was me and a cousin of mine who was sitting behind. All the pride, the self worth, a sense of belonging, the identity, was reduced to ashes when the ‘army wala’ ordered-dono niche utar jao.
It was the two of us who were frisked. The others, my friends, my hindu friends, received a warm greeting and the army wala waved them off with a smiling face.
It was their turn to be proud. I was shattered. Was it not I who belonged to the place?
I needed recognition. I needed respect. I needed the army wala-the state, to, at least, acknowledge the fact that I belonged to the place. The least I needed was to be treated at par with my friends. I have not been at peace ever since. The incident has left a deep scar on my soul. The greater tragedy however is that I see no signs of it healing-not now, not any time in the future.
One can not be but amazed at the linkage between the two incidents. Of Amarnath and of Shankar Acharya. Of a Muslim driving his Hindu friends. But it is the third aspect of the similarities that needs introspection.
It is the problem of recognition and assertion. Perhaps, everyone is not a coward like me. There are some people who would risk their lives to give it back to the ‘army wala’. I could not. I regret. Pehaps some years of living in kashmir would instill that courage in me(I must clarify that ‘give it back’ does not necessarily imply violence.It takes more courage to lodge a non violent protest-just as the Mahatma did)
It is not the mere fact of land transfer, in vacuum, devoid of any history that is causing havoc. It is a million incidents of dissimilar treatment like the one I faced en route Shankar Acharya Temple that build up a psyche. It is this fact that needs to be taken care of.
To say the least, WE also want a right to live with ‘human dignity’.

(The topic derives its name from the book of the same name authored by Amartya sen)

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Thoughts for an ignorant citizen

I got some comments from some anonymous blogger who appears to be totally at bay as far as facts are concerned. I have put in a small effort to gather critical facts for enlightening such people.
Dear Anonymous Ignorant Citizen from Jalandhar,
The reason for the sad state of Kashmir affairs today is ignorant people like you – Unaware of history, blind-eyed and deaf-eared towards present - vociferously shouting irrelevant facts.

First, you must read History of Kashmir and of your own motherland. Your grandfather might not have told you, but we were not even under British Occupation. Not even like your 500 princely states. We were an independent state when India and her 500 princely states were fighting for Independence. Do you know that even today, J&K is the only Indian state to have its own Flag, and its own set of laws? You might have never heard of Ranbir Penal Code (RPC) (and not Indian Penal Code (IPC)) that is still being followed in all courts across J&K.

After India got Independence, Nehru and Jinnah decided to divide (and thus fulfill the wishes of the British Crown, by falling to their policy of divide and rule) the great nation into India and Pakistan. About 12 million people were displaced and about 1 million killed in the aftermath of partition. However, personally I feel that millions of people who were killed till date in innumerable riots across India and Pakistan, and the Hindu-Muslim divide that exists today are primarily because of the seeds of hatred that were sown by our leaders by enacting the unique and most dreaded partition of people.

Even after the partition, Kashmir was independent. Seeing a weak neighbor with no military power, Pakistani tribesmen attacked Kashmir. Sheikh Abdullah, who was then the Prime Minister of Kashmir, had no option but to ask India for help. India agreed subject to the state of Jammu & Kashmir acceding into India.

J&K was the most peaceful country and that is the reason why it didn’t even have its own army. It was a symbol of peace. Hindus and Muslims lived in absolute harmony, just as they did in India before partition. Shiekh Abdullah, having seen the dreaded partition did not want that hatred to flow into J&K. That is the reason why he negotiated for Article 370. To insulate our motherland from the hatred that had spread across India and Pakistan, but only till such time an independent plebiscite of the State was conducted as per the UN resolution.

"Led by Britain and the United States, the U.N Security Council passed another resolution (Resolution 47) on April 21, 1948, which enlarged the membership of the UNCIP from 3 to 5 , called for cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan, withdrawal of all Pakistani troops and tribesmen and bulk of Indian troops(except for a minimal number required for maintaining law order),allowing return of refugees, release of political prisoners and holding of a U.N supervised Plebiscite in the (Princely)State of Jammu and Kashmir to determine the aspirations of her people. The Plebiscite was to be held by a U.N appointed Plebiscite administrator. The U.N Security Council passed another resolution on June3, 1948, which reaffirmed the previous resolutions and asked the UNCIP to proceed to the "disputed areas" to carry out its mission as stated under Resolution 47 of April 21, 1948.”

“The U.N involvement in the Kashmir Conflict largely lasted for 17 years (1948-65).After the Indo-Pak war of 1965, the U.N engagement with Kashmir continued at a very nominal level till the 3rd Pakistan-India war of 1971 and completely ended with the signing of the Simla Agreement in 1972, an Indo-Pak peace agreement, which laid emphasis on adopting a bilateral framework to solve the Kashmir imbroglio and kept the U.N out of the picture afterwards.” .

For more on Indian stance on Kashmir during this period click here

What had happened had happened and could not be changed. People of J&K had reconciled with the fact that they were better-off with India. (If you are meek and weak, you need a big brother). However, when our big brother started bullying us the unrest started all over again. Election rigging was the main cause of hatred against India.

"From 1953 to 1975, Chief Ministers of that State [of J&K] had been nominees of Delhi. Their appointment to that post was legitimised by the holding of farcical and totally rigged elections in which the Congress party led by Delhi's nominee was elected by huge majorities." B.K. Nehru, who was Governor of Kashmir from 1981 to 1984, in his memoirs published in 1997.

Now, that you have some background, let us come to your 1-2-3 Agenda.

1. “Stay with us, i.e. INDIA.we`ve all ways treated you like our misbehaved/rotten brothers. We`ll continue to feed you with essential commodities, food supplies, money, central packages, developmemtal work etc. ( All for our motherland HINDUSTAN)”

The fact that you have treated us like your rotten brothers is a justification enough for what is happening today in Kashmir.

2. “Fight with us, leave us and goto the Mighty Pakisthan - the country with ISLAMIC rules. ;)We would be more than happy to see our rotten brother happy. But come to think of it, how and where would you sell those apples, those shawls, those carvings, or nights at dal lake? whom? i bet pakishan with its poor poor people would be more than willing to pay.Fact: pak population 144 million.Poverty rate 35%Ref: CIA Factbook.I`m sure how big a buying power Pakistan is. BIG BIG Industrialised economy of pak. :)”

I have already said that we are weak and cannot fight India or Pakistan militarily. But whatever voices we are raising are against the ill-treatment by our elder brother.

You may like to see how our elder brother treats us:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTNBB94hDBw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gbWI8QHitA

If you have a weaker neighbor, or a brother, do you help him come up or do you stamp upon him with all your might and beat the hell out of him? As far as I have read no religion preaches that. The sad part is that we do everything in the name of religion but never bother to see what it actually preaches.

3. BE independent of INDIA & Pakistan. - This one is a real joke.If you are independent of us, then:you get no subsidised essentials, no telecom, no tax breaks, no cheap food, no cheap labour, no access to our vast capital base, no army protection, amogst others.China, a dictatorship, is more than willing to attck u, to show its superamacy in the region. Pak, with nothin to show off really, would still try n attack, to salvage pride.kashmir would be the worlds biggest terrorist school, a haven for al quidas and SIMIs..America would be more than willing to attck and invade you. The best base america can get, seeing the approxmity with CHINDIA.So, while u decide, i`ll have to get back to work, as you are my liability rite now, if i dont earn, how you get subsidised food, great rail, air, road connect, huge central packages, subsidies for haj ..etc…etc..

Some disgusted people have been raising this point these days. I am happy though that such people a small bunch - uninformed, immature and naïve.

Thoughts for you from another blogger:

“Kashmiris are happy to take the money…’ he (Vir Sanghvi)mocks. One may ask why extend special rights and billions of rupees if there is no justification for them in the normal functioning of the State of India. Or is it that these are given with an insidious intent- a purpose to appease, to numb, to help forget.”

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Jammu & Kashmir, Population Distribution




Note: For some readers who have commented on the authenticity of the data on the table above:
The data is on the site of the Planning Commission in the J&K State Demographic Report Chapter II page No. 31 Table No. II.8. May be directly accessed by clicking here:

http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/stateplan/sdr_jandk/sdr_jkch2.pdf

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Response to State Times Article

Response to a State Times Article, reproduced again on a Blog

"Statetimes, a Jammu daily reports on the selection list of CET for MBBS, BDS, BVSc this year, “Take, for example, the share of non-Muslims in MBBS select list. Out of total of 290 seats, 93 have gone to the non-Muslims, including Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and Kashmiri Hindus. That means their share is a paltry 32 per cent. As for their share in open merit, it is 33 out of a total of 125 seats.In other words, it is just 12.5 per cent. Should it be taken to mean that non-Muslim aspirants are simply incompetent? They are not. In fact, they are exceptionally bright. Paradoxically, the share of the Muslim youth of Jammu is even less.Their number is not more than 25 and most of them have got selected under certain categories, including those belonging to the Scheduled Tribe. As for the selection of the Muslim aspirants under the open category, it is almost zero. The plight of the Muslim youth belonging to Kargil is no different. They have got only a couple of seats and that too under one category or the other”.
Discriminatory attitude is being extended at every step despite the growing resentment of the Jammu region. Any listeners?"

Response:

Of the combined population of two regions, Jammu region accounts for 31% and Kashmir for 69%. So, any person with basic logic and reasoning would agree that on an equitable basis, the distribution of seats should be in the ratio of 31:69 and not 50:50.
93 out of 290 seats means 32% which is 3 seats more than the fair value of 90 (31% of 290)
Again, in open merit 33 out of 125 seats is 26.4 % and not 12.5% (Mind your numbers!!!), which are again only a few seats less than the fair value of 38.

“Paradoxically, the share of the Muslim youth of Jammu is even less.”
It is no paradox, it is a logical representation of numbers. Since the population of muslims in Jammu is less, their number in the list is also less.
For seeing the real paradox, please click here

Monday, October 6, 2008

Discrimination - Myth or Reality?


I have made an attempt below to analytically translate numbers to reflect the policy of the Government across the two regions of our state - Jammu & Kashmir. Of the combined population of two regions, Jammu region accounts for 31% and Kashmir for 69%. So, on an equitable basis, I have derived a fair value under each head below, which has been arrived at by bifurcating the total in the ratio of 31:69.

I have tried to analyse the trend of distribution across various variables. It is for the readers to comment on the results.










































































































































































































































































































































































































Jammu



Kashmir



Population Lacs



30



68



%



31%



69%









Govt. Employees



138300



175440



Fair Value



109120



242880



Excess/(Deficit)



29180



(67440)



Excess/(Deficit) %



27%



-28%









IAS Officers



27



24



Fair Value



16



35



Excess/(Deficit)



11



(11)



Excess/(Deficit) %



71%



-32%









Chief Secretaries till
date



20



6



Fair Value



8



18



Excess/(Deficit)



12



(12)



Excess/(Deficit) %



148%



-67%









KAS Officers



151



155



Fair Value



95



211



Excess/(Deficit)



56



(56)



Excess/(Deficit) %



59%



-27%









KAS 2001 till date



372



106



Fair Value



148



330



Excess/(Deficit)



224



(224)



Excess/(Deficit) %



151%



-68%









Agriculture Assistants



1015



641



Fair Value



513



1143



Excess/(Deficit)



502



(502)



Excess/(Deficit) %



98%



-44%









Accounts Assistants



334



95



Fair Value



133



296



Excess/(Deficit)



201



(201)



Excess/(Deficit) %



151%



-68%









Infrastructural Package
(Rs Crores)



12351



6448



Fair Value



5828



12971



Excess/(Deficit)



6523



(6523)



Excess/(Deficit) %



112%



-50%









Excise Refund 2006-07 (Rs.
Crores)



860



90



Fair Value



295



656



Excess/(Deficit)



566



(566)



Excess/(Deficit) %



192%



-86%









Sales Tax Refund 2006-07
(Rs. Crores)



360



40



Fair Value



124



276



Excess/(Deficit)



236



(236)



Excess/(Deficit) %



190%



-86%









Prime Ministers Gram Sadak
Yojana (Kilometres)



2967



1451



Fair Value



1370



3048



Excess/(Deficit)



1597



(1597)



Excess/(Deficit) %



117%



-52%









Prime Ministers Gram Sadak
Yojana (Rs. Crores)



1405



687



Fair Value



649



1443



Excess/(Deficit)



756



(756)



Excess/(Deficit) %



117%



-52%









DIGs



5



2



Fair Value



2



5



Excess/(Deficit)



3



(3)



Excess/(Deficit) %



130%



-59%









IGPs



5



4



Fair Value



3



6



Excess/(Deficit)



2



(2)



Excess/(Deficit) %



79%



-36%









SPs (KAS)



87



46



Fair Value



41



92



Excess/(Deficit)



46



(46)



Excess/(Deficit) %



111%



-50%